top of page

Managing Design Changes During Construction to Control Cost and Responsibility

5 minutes ago
4 min read

Construction projects rarely proceed exactly as planned. Design changes during construction are common and often necessary. Yet, these changes can affect the project’s scope, cost, schedule, procurement, and responsibilities. Without a clear process, they can lead to disputes, delays, and cost overruns.


In this article, I explain how to manage design changes effectively in renovation, fit-out, or construction projects in Thailand. Following a formal change-control process helps keep projects on track and ensures all parties understand the impact before work proceeds.



Eye-level view of construction site with workers reviewing blueprints
Eye-level view of construction site with workers reviewing blueprints


Why Construction Changes Occur


Changes during construction happen for many reasons. Some common causes include:


  • Owner requests for modifications or upgrades

  • Design development revealing better solutions

  • Unforeseen site conditions such as hidden utilities or soil issues

  • New or updated authority requirements and regulations

  • Unavailability of specified materials or products

  • Contractor proposals for alternative methods or cost savings

  • Errors or omissions in original design documents


It is important to record the reason for each change clearly. This record should avoid assigning blame or legal responsibility prematurely. Understanding why a change is needed helps the project team evaluate its impact objectively.



Defining the Proposed Change Clearly


Before any pricing or instruction, the proposed change must be clearly defined. This includes:


  • The original design or requirement

  • The exact modification requested

  • The reason for the change

  • Drawings or documents affected

  • Any completed work impacted

  • The party requesting the change


Verbal requests should never be treated as approved instructions. All changes must be documented in writing to avoid misunderstandings later.



Reviewing the Technical Impact


The design team should assess how the change affects all technical aspects of the project. This includes architecture, structure, mechanical, electrical, plumbing (MEP) systems, finishes, furniture, and adjoining work.


Even minor changes can have significant technical consequences. For example, changing a wall location might affect structural supports or MEP routing. A thorough review ensures the change is feasible and identifies any additional design work required.



Assessing the Cost Impact


The contractor’s cost proposal for the change should detail:


  • Labour required

  • Materials and equipment needed

  • Demolition or removal of existing work

  • Waste disposal and logistics

  • Overhead and profit


The project team should review the basis of the price, including quantities and unit rates. Any uncertainty or assumptions should be clearly recorded. This transparency helps avoid disputes over cost later.



Close-up view of contractor calculating construction costs with documents
Close-up view of contractor calculating construction costs with documents


Assessing the Programme Impact


Changes can affect the project schedule in several ways:


  • Material lead times may increase

  • Completed activities might need rework

  • Subcontractor sequences could be disrupted

  • Practical completion dates may shift


The contractor’s proposal should separate the direct working time for the change from broader impacts on the overall construction programme. This distinction helps the project team understand the true schedule effect.



Identifying Responsibility Without Assumptions


The change record should clearly identify:


  • Who requested the change

  • Who prepared the revised design

  • Who reviews compliance with standards and regulations

  • Who approves the work


Responsibility depends on the contract terms and the specific facts of the change. Avoid assumptions or assigning blame without proper review.



Approval Before Work Proceeds


No change should proceed without clear approval status. Typical statuses include:


  • Proposed

  • Under review

  • Approved

  • Rejected


Even urgent work requires a recorded instruction defining the scope and cost basis. This protects all parties and ensures clarity.



Maintaining a Change Register


A change register is essential for tracking all design changes. It should include:


  • Unique reference number

  • Description of the change

  • Originator of the change

  • Cost status (proposed, approved, rejected)

  • Programme status

  • Final agreed value


Small changes can add up. Reporting the cumulative effect helps the owner and project team understand the overall impact.



High angle view of project manager updating change register on laptop
High angle view of project manager updating change register on laptop


Updating Project Records


Once a change is approved, all project documents must be updated. This includes:


  • Drawings and specifications

  • Cost plans and contract values

  • Inspection and testing requirements


A signed change order should never remain disconnected from site documents. Keeping records current avoids confusion during construction and handover.



Common Mistakes to Avoid


Some frequent errors in managing design changes include:


  • Instructing changes verbally without documentation

  • Starting work without a clear scope or cost agreement

  • Ignoring the impact on the project schedule

  • Failing to update project records and drawings

  • Treating contractor proposals as approved instructions


Avoiding these mistakes reduces risk and keeps the project on track.



Practical Change-Control Sequence


A reliable process for managing design changes includes these steps:


  1. Identify and record the change request

  2. Confirm the reason and gather required information

  3. Review technical impacts with the design team

  4. Obtain cost and programme impact details from the contractor

  5. Clarify responsibility and approval authority

  6. Approve, reject, or conditionally approve the change

  7. Issue a controlled instruction to proceed

  8. Monitor implementation on site

  9. Update all project records and documents

10. Close the change with evidence of completion


Following this sequence ensures changes are managed transparently and efficiently.



Managing design changes effectively requires coordination between the owner, design team, and contractor. For example, services like design coordination, change-control administration, and cost-impact review can help streamline this process.


In Thailand, companies such as AD ASIA Consulting offer these services to support project teams. Their expertise in programme-impact review and construction management helps avoid costly delays and disputes. Engaging such specialists early can improve project outcomes.



Change is inevitable in construction. The key is to ensure every change is understood, authorised, priced, recorded, and integrated into the project. This approach protects budgets, schedules, and relationships.


If you are planning a renovation, fit-out, or construction project in Thailand, consider a professional Construction Change-Control Review before proceeding with design changes. This step can save time and money by clarifying impacts upfront.



Disclaimer: Design changes, contractual authority, valuation, time entitlement, engineering, and approval requirements must be reviewed for each project by qualified professionals. This article provides general guidance only.



By managing design changes carefully, projects can stay on course and deliver the expected results. Clear communication, thorough review, and proper documentation are essential. This ensures that changes add value rather than risk.


For more information on managing design changes and construction projects in Asia, visit AD ASIA Consulting.



Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating*
bottom of page